Of course the easy answer to this is to just bake the cake or to just find a different bakery, but I need to go into more depth due to the nature of this assignment. While this process has been very difficult, it could have indeed been solved very easily, I usually have sided with the baker but for this entry I’ll go into more depth of each side. If Jack Phillips did just make the cake, that would have prevented the whole case but he would have betrayed his religious values, which according to him, could make him a sinner. However, he could have just thought of it as any wedding cake if he really needed to.
On the other hand, had the couple known that it was a religious bakery (it could or could not have been mentioned in the front) they could have put those thoughts in mind, which seems a little messed up now that I’m typing it. They could have also just gone to another bakery after learning about the first ones morals. But if they could have had no idea about the bakers religious values, then I can totally see why they got upset about the fact they wouldn’t bake the cake for them.
For the Transgender lady I mentioned in the first entry, she was very aware that the bakery, Masterpiece Cakeshop, was religious and went and asked for a cake celebrating a gender transition anyways. Sure, you have the freedom to do that, but why would you? She already had to be aware that Jack wouldn’t bake her cake but decided to try anyways. So for this reason I feel almost no sympathy for her, which may be a little harsh but this is important.
I do feel sympathy for Jack and the couple though, they had gone through so much work just because they wanted a wedding cake and Jack refused to bake it, the case had started back in 2012 and is still going on today. I may have a very opinionated say on the matter but they should still get a cake of course. I just feel that a certain someone saw this lawsuit and hopped on trying to get into a part of the action and it’s not a very cool thing to do.
Now that we have solutions that could have worked previously and also have gotten a little off topic again, some solutions for the current time could be to drop the charges, find a new bakery, or bake the wedding cake, even if it needs some really have negotiating.
To recap everything, in 2012 Charlie and David wanted to buy a wedding cake to celebrate their marriage and Jack declined due to his religion, they complained to the CCRC who sued, the court ruled the CCRC in favor and make Jack make the cake, Jack then appealed and it was brought to the Supreme Court where they eventually ruled in favor of Jack stating that the first amendment gives him the right to freedom of religion where he is allowed to deny someone a cake due to his religious values.